You're so narrow minded it amazes me. You weren't listening to me, were you?
Perhaps I can put it into context for you- the book I cited was published in 2000. You cited a reference for 1988. What I said- had you lifted your head out of your bias for a moment long enough to read what I said- was that this research has come into question and is not accepted any more. That is the 'last I had heard.' Last year I read material on the Shroud's main web page confirming much the same.
You're working with old information.
I don't particularly care. I don't need the Shroud. I suppose it must send shivers up your spine though if it can't be debunked. Or, should we say, from your point of view, old information or not, it doesn't matter- it simply CAN'T be real. Its simply NOT possible. There can BE no evidence for the supernatural, because you already know that there is no supernatural, and you have derived that position from your view that there is no evidence for the supernatural.... which you have already assumed there can't be at all.