Shalom -
my last post did not address you - nor does this one.
You can run from the discussion if you see fit. I does not matter to me.
My Jewish friends that choose to hate me did so because they were "offended that I had returned to Christianity". It seems they need a class on religious tolerance.
For those of you following the discussion:
I wasn't aware that the encyclopedia of Judaism was written by "right wing" fanatics.
It does talk about the Noachian Laws and says outright that the penalty for breaking one law is death by decapitation.
Anyone with questions should look it up.
One of the most famous Rabbis in Judaism (Rambam) called Christians idolaters. He said this while living among Muslims. He chose to live among Muslims because he claim they were not Idolaters and he preferred them to Christians.
Christians seeking the truth about what is taught by Noachides and Judaism concerning Christianity should be alert and careful when asking questions.
Some Jewish people will tell you that Christianity is not Idolatry for a Gentile.
I asked an Orthodox Rabbi at AskMoses.com about this and he said that the confusion comes with regard to taking oaths. The details are not settled. But some Jewish authorities say the belief in the trinity is only poo-pootuff (assigning partners to God) and therefore permissible to gentiles when taking oaths but not permissible to Jews.
But the catch is that this only relates to taking oaths and not to worship. And he was very clear to tell me that the worship of Jesus is absolutely forbidden to Gentiles as well as Jews.
My goal is to let Christians know that the Noachide Laws as taught by Noachides and Jews are very hostile to the Christians faith.
All of Judaism teaches that gentiles are bound the Noachian Covenant which is the 7 Laws. To claim anything else is a lie.
In a book called Everyman's Talmud it discusses that the Torah was for all mankind and it will be a happy day when they all accept it.
The explanation is that Torah was given to Israel and Israel is to be a light to the nations. The nations accept Torah by accepting their obligation to live by the Noachian Laws. Are you getting the point?
In Judaism and the Gentile Faiths, Joseph Schultz writes:
"The Laws of the Sons of Noah are referred to in the New Testament. The author of The Acts of the Apostles was confronted by communities of newly converted Christians who had not abandoned their pagan practices and licentious way of life. He wrote to them to "abstain from polutions of idols ..... from fornication ..... from things strangled and from blood" [Acts 15:20]. There are references to at least four of the Noahite Laws, the prohibitions against (1) idolatry, (2) sexual immorality, (3) the avoidance of cruelty to animals by strangling a living creature, (4) the prohibition against eating blood, which is one of the rabbinic variants of the Noahite Laws." [or this could be interpreted as the prohibition against shedding blood, i.e. murder which is one of the basic Noahite Laws]
Here we have an attempt by someone to reinterpret our Christian scriptures.
Even Shalom made this attempt earlier in this thread.
It is crazy to say that the early church had the Noachide Laws in mind in any of the examples in the New Testament. Remember the Noachide Laws call for the establishment of courts to establish these laws and to kill for violations.
Yet the new testament tells us not to take our brothers to court!!! When the man was caught living with his mother in law - Paul said put him out of fellowship. No mention of decapitation. Later, if memory serves me, the man was allowed back in fellowship.
So Jewish leaders want the sole right to interpret their Torah and also the right to interpret our New Testament scriptures. They are offended when we tell them that they do not correctly understand the Old testament, yet it appears that they expect us to allow them to tell us that we do not correctly understand our New Testament scriptures.
Here is another quote from a noachide site:
The Talmud does record that Moses obligated the Jews to spread the knowledge of the Noahide commandments to all mankind. What if the pious Essenes had attempted such a mission to the Gentiles, and Jesus and Paul had been successful in bringing their efforts to fruition? (Such an approach does not diminish in any manner from the centrality of the Gospels and Christian tradition for Christians. To the contrary, it obligates Christians all the more to search for the correct interpretation of their tradition.)
Funny thing is, they act as if Christians have never hear people claim that Jesus and the disciples never intended to start a new faith. And that they never viewed Jesus as God.
Ridiculous!!! These ideas have been debated for centuries. And for Centuries they have been rejected by the Christian authorities and the Church fathers.
As Christians we should be aware of the agenda of people who make such attempts to redefine our faith.
To believe the words of the New Testament and to follow and worship Jesus as God - is held by them as an offence worthy of death and the Noachide Laws say it is so.
You see the attitude when they attempt to tell us that Acts records the early church leaders indorsing the noachide laws. The laws of Noah are not even mentioned. How many time does the New Testament mention the law of Moses? Yet they just happen to forget the Noachide covenant? Non-sense - they did not know of it, nor did they indorse it.
The attitude also comes across when they attempt to persuade us that Jesus was just a "good Jew" who would be shocked at how Christianity developed. That He never claimed to be God.
Why do they do that if they do not see our belief in Him and worship of Him as God as blasphemy and idolatry? The truth is that they do see it as blasphemy and idolatry.
As far as hostility goes - it was Nojc who labeled Christianity as Anti-Semitic and Shalom's definition agreed. So it appears the hostility did not began with my claims but with theirs.
Maybe to them defense is hostility. So be it!
cook