OK. What you just did was vow not to make a prediction based on anecdotes. Then you immediately gave an anecdote and implied that Palin was therefore not a drag on the ticket. The fact is that lots of more objective surveys have arrived at the exact opposite conclusion to your anecdote.
Nonsense. What I implied is that it may not be the case that Palin is a drag on the ticket. I didn't make any predictions. I simply pointed out some simple facts from my experience. I did say that I was surprised, didn't I? If I believed everything you said, Cop, this woman- quite liberal- would have hated Palin.
As for 'objective surveys' I really think surveys by the Huffington Post don't really pass as 'objective' and frankly I have as much confidence in the reporting of the main stream media as I do in the objectiveness of the Huffington Post.
Palin had some rough patches but rebounded just fine. McCain was torpedoed by one thing and one thing only: the collapse of the mortgage banking industry.
And this was out of his control.
And of course this economic collapse was the fault of Democrats going back to Carter and more recently can be attributed to the third highest recipient of lobbying funds from Freddie/Fanny... a certain Barack Obama. Just one more thing not reported by the MSM, who were more then happy to pin it on Bush and by extension, McCain.
Even though McCain was one who actually had put together legislation to prevent exactly what happened. Oh well, we live in lala land, rather than the land of reality. I'm used to it.
http://blogwonks.com/2008/09/17/mccain-predicted-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-debacle/