Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 15   Go Down

Author Topic: Genesis is Made Up  (Read 40415 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2006, 12:25:02 PM »

The 'gap theory' does not hold water, though.   The passage is consistent with a pattern often seen in Genesis and throughout the OT.

Verse 1 is merely the introduction.

"In the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth."

Summary statement.  It is not chronologically attached to verse 2:

"Now the earth was formless and empty...." verse three  "and God said.."

Verse 1 is an introduction, verse 2 begins the account.

2:4 does not begin another account, the way modern translations make it seem with their headings.  1:1 was the intro.  2:4 is the conclusion.

1:1  In the beginning... 2:4a  this is the account of the heavens and the earth....

2:4b should actually get its own new verse.  It is the beginning of a whole new thought...

"When the LORD God made the earth..." thru to verse 7 is all one introductory thought.  Verse 8 begins the story, which 4b-7 just laid the context for.  It is the particular story of the specific account of creation of man and woman.  2:25 is the conclusion of the thought.

Other examples where we see such structures...

Genesis 5:1.  Clearly, 5:1-2 is not yet a third 'creation account,' even though it is similar to 2:4b, which skeptics have tried to pass off as a second creation account.  Genesis 6:8 completes the thought begun in 5:1 (again, in contrast to the headings placed by english translators).  6:9 is the beginning of the account of Noah, not 6:1.

A good example of an introduction that is clearly not chronologically tied to the next passage, look at 12:10-11

10  Now there was a famine in the land, and Abram went down to Egypt to live there for awhile because the famine was severe.  11 As he was about to enter Egypt, he said to his wife Sarai, "I know what a beautiful woman you are..."

If verse 10 and verse 11 are chronologically tied together, it is nonsense.  In verse 10 he is already in Egypt.  In verse 11 he is about to enter it.  It is easy in this case to see that verse 10 is an introduction and 11 is the beginning of the story.

It is the same sort of construct as we see in verse 1:1 and 1:2, though.  There is no 'gap' between Abram's being in Egypt (12:10) and his 'about to enter Egypt' (12:11) for us to feed possibilities into.  12:10 is just a summary.

Another example.

Genesis 26:1-2.  26:1 is a summary statement.  It provides necessary context for the story which formally begins in 26:2.

There are multiple examples.  Some are obvious to tell.  It is not a leap to recognize the same pattern at work in Genesis 1.

It might be helpful for lurkers to realize that the writer of Genesis did not include verse numbers.  ;)  The writer of Genesis also did not put in chapter numbers or the current headings.  In fact, the writer of Genesis did not even include vowels.  :)  These all came later.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Deep Thought

  • Predominant User
  • *
  • Feedback: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 689
  • Feet on the ground and head in the clouds...
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #21 on: April 11, 2006, 03:39:26 PM »

Let me try.

The Bible was written so ancient Jewish people would understand, and thus uses language and reference the Jews of the time would actually understand. The use of "lights" (Tony's translation, of which I have no knowledge about it's validity) in reference to the sun and moon, which are indeed "lights" to the ancient Jewish mind, was expected, sensible, and probably the best course of action. It might have even been absurd at that time to say that the moon was a giant sphere of cratered rock reflecting the light of a massively more giant ball of fire. In any case, Genesis and the rest of the Torah/Pentateuch is a history of the God Yahweh, his creation of the Earth, and the events leading up through to the formation of Israel's (for lack of a better term to describe the tribal communities of the time) original nation; it is not an astronomy textbook. (Whether said history is fact or fiction I leave for you all to decide.) So I see no reason why it should have provided a detailed schematic of the universe.

Is that basically what you were trying to say in regards to the moonlight/sunset issue? Because if there was any confusion as to your point, I could not see it.

Quote
Quote:
But no one is saying that God wrote Genesis


Then we agree that it was made up.


Actually, my understanding of the traditional Christian and Jewish beliefs is that Moses wrote Genesis, inspired by God... but I guess that issue can be dealt with in Johnny's new thread.
Logged
"I am he that rules the world, don't you know?" - Jarlaxle

"Do keep ever present in your thoughts, my friend, that an illusion can kill you if you believe in it."

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #22 on: April 11, 2006, 04:59:00 PM »

Quote from: sntjohnny
The 'gap theory' does not hold water, though.   The passage is consistent with a pattern often seen in Genesis and throughout the OT.



Tony's reply:
Actually it is the truth. How do I know? The Bible says that God did not create the earth a chaos:

Isa 45:18 For thus says Yahweh, Creator of the heavens; He is the Elohim, and Former of the earth, and its Maker, and He, He established it. He did not create it a chaos. He formed it to be indwelt. "I am Yahweh, and there is none else."

It actually became that way AFTER He created it

Gen 1:1-2  Created by the Elohim were the heavens and the earth.  (2)  Yet the earth became a chaos and vacant, and darkness was on the surface of the submerged chaos. Yet the spirit of the Elohim is vibrating over the surface of the water.

Between the earth becoming a chaos and God making the earth habitable again could have taken millions of years.

There may have been millions of years from when God originally created the earth pristine and habitable to when it became chaos as well.

Tony
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #23 on: April 11, 2006, 05:06:15 PM »

I provided ample examples corroborating what I said.  This is not a theological argument.  Its a literary one.  There is no 'gap' between 1:1 and 1:2.   I point you once again to 12:10-11, which has the same structure, but is easier to recognize.  Use the clear to understand the less clear.   I cited a pattern from Genesis itself- internal evidence.  You had to run to Isaiah, written at a different time by a different author- external evidence.

Whether or not the sequence you think exists is irrelevant to whether or not it is justifiable using standard literary interpretation techniques to make room for a 'gap' in Genesis.

Moses used summary statements ALL THE TIME.  I gave you several examples.  There are dozens and dozens more.  It's his style.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #24 on: April 11, 2006, 05:12:17 PM »

Gen 12:10-11  And coming is a famine in the land. And down is Abram going to Egypt to sojourn there, for heavy is the famine in the land.  (11)  And coming is it, as Abram nears to come to Egypt, that saying is Abram to Sarai, his wife, "Behold, pray! I know that a woman of lovely appearance are you,

Your version is not correct.

Abram was in the process of going to Egypt and before he got there it was then he told Sarai his wife what to do. You can't take that and make Genesis 1:1,2 do a circus act.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #25 on: April 11, 2006, 05:50:36 PM »

"Your version is not correct."

I could pull it from the Hebrew, if I needed to.  In fact, I have.  I suggest you do the same.

Peace.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2006, 05:57:49 PM »

Logic is on my side. Sorry njc but God did not create the earth a chaos Isaiah 45:18 it became that way Gen.1:2.

Your account of Abraham going to Egypt and God creating the earth are not one and the same even by the longest stretch of the imagination.

Abram going to Egypt and on the way telling his wife something just is no the same thing as God creating the earth and it became chaos and vacant.

If I wanted to enlarge upon the verses if I include the Isaiah verse in question I could say:

In the beginning God created the earth to be inhabited. He did not create it a chaos. But guess what, it became chaos and vacant many years later.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2006, 06:05:02 PM »

"Logic is on my side."

But reason is on my side.  You don't understand my argument.

"Your account of Abraham going to Egypt and God creating the earth are not one and the same even by the longest stretch of the imagination."

And this is proof that you don't understand what I'm talking about.  Its the structure of the narrative.  Moses was constantly using introductory comments and then following them by the actual narrative.  Once this pattern is detected, it is easy to see that this is the case in Genesis 1:1-2 as well.

For a feller constantly going off on modern translations, you don't seem to be willing to follow me in a similar criticism.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2006, 07:49:49 PM »

For the Abrahamic story to be like the creation account it would have to say:

Abraham went down to Egypt as a sane man. Then Abraham became insane.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2006, 08:10:14 PM »

*shrug*
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Stathei

  • Guest
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #30 on: April 11, 2006, 08:48:46 PM »

:smt043  :smt038  :smt005  [raisetheroof  :smt043  :smt040

Best. Thread. Ever. The funniest part of the funniest group of posts I have ever read was:

Quote
I could pull it from the Hebrew, if I needed to. In fact, I have. I suggest you do the same.


Genius! It's condescending, pseudointellectual, and completely hilarious, all at the same time. SJ, you are BACK! Christian on Christian catfights RULE!
Logged

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #31 on: April 11, 2006, 09:12:26 PM »

How is it pseudointellectual?
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Stathei

  • Guest
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #32 on: April 11, 2006, 09:38:26 PM »

Quote
How is it pseudointellectual?


STOP! SJ, I'm choking! Have mercy! [whiteflag
Logged

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #33 on: April 11, 2006, 09:45:04 PM »

You make this charge all of the time.  Its just strikes me as a way throw around a label and duck having to respond.

Genesis is written in Hebrew.  Tony tried to refute my point by appealing to another English translation, completely missing the point.  Tony ought to have known better.  If I were resting MY argument on the English, I would be at fault.  I wouldn't have even opened my mouth.

Now, which part of this is 'pseudointellectual?'  Perhaps you can illustrate it by contrast- why don't you put it in actual intellectual terms.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #34 on: April 11, 2006, 11:03:29 PM »

TonyN said:

Sorry njc but God did not create the earth a chaos Isaiah 45:18 it became that way Gen.1:2.

I accept your apology.
But until now, I haven't been a participant in this thread, so why you buried your apology here rather than where it was requested is unclear to me.

Rashi on the issue: [http://www.tachash.org/metsudah/b01r.html] The  numbers are not verse designators, but rather are references to the footnotes.

[9] But if you insist on the simple interpretation, interpret it thus. At the beginning of the creation of heaven and earth, when the world was unformed and desolate, G-d said, "Let there be light." This verse does not intend to teach the sequence of creation -- that these were [created] first. For if that was the intention, it should have written, "At first G-d created the heavens," etc. For the word {Hebrew Ref} never appears in Scripture except when it is annexed to the following word. For example, "At the beginning of Yehoyakim's reign,"10 [or] "The beginning of his reign,"11 [or] "The first of your corn crop."12 Here, too, you must interpret "In the beginning El-him created" as if [it were written] "At the beginning of the creating." [We find] similarly, " {Hebrew Ref} ," as if to say, "At the beginning of G-d's speaking to Hoshea, G-d said to Hoshea," etc.13 If you would claim that [the verse] intends to convey that these [i.e., heaven and earth] were created first, and its interpretation is that at the beginning of everything He created these; and that there are [other] such verses that are shortened omitting a word, such as, "For [it] did not shut the doors of my womb,"14 omitting who it is that closes [the womb]; and "[It] will remove the army of Damascus,"15 omitting who it is that takes it away; and, "Does [it] plow with oxen?"16 without explicitly stating, "Does man plow with oxen?" and, "He relates the end from the beginning,"17 without stating explicitly, "He relates from the beginning of something, the end of something." If this is so, you must question yourself.18 Because [as it happens] water preceded [the heavens and the earth,] for it is written, "The breath of El-him hovered above the surface of the water," Scripture not yet having revealed when the creation of the water took place,19 thus teaching that the waters preceded the earth. And further [proof of the above is that] since the heavens were created from fire and water,20 you are therefore forced [to admit] that Scripture did not [intend to] teach anything of the earlier or later sequence [of creation].

    El-him created.21

    It is not written "Ad-noy created!"22 [This is] because at first He intended to create it with the attribute of justice, but then saw that the world cannot exist and gave priority to the attribute of mercy and joined it with the attribute of justice. This [thought] is conveyed in the verse, "On the day when Ad-noy El-him made earth and heaven."23

Verse 2: Unformed and desolate.

    {Hebrew Ref} signifies wonder and astonishment. I.e., a person would be awed and astonished by its emptiness. {Hebrew Ref} in Old French is estordison.

    Desolate.

    {Hebrew Ref} means desolation and empty space.

______

9 {Hebrew Ref} is thus interpreted as {Hebrew Ref} , i.e., for the sake of those that are called {Hebrew Ref} ---the Torah and Israel.

10 Ibid. 26, 1.

11 Bereishis 10, 10.

12 Devarim 18, 4.

13 Hoshea 1, 2.

14 Iyov 3, 1.

15 Yeshayahu 8, 4.

16 Amos 6, 12.

17 Yeshayahu 46, 10.

18 If you insist on the interpretation that the verse is conveying the order of creation.

19 I.e., if Scripture intended to convey the order of creation, then before mentioning the waters, it should have related that water was created. (S.C.)

20 Chagigah 12a.

21 The Name of G-d as Judge of the Universe.

22 The Name of G-d in His merciful role.

23 Bereishis 2, 4.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #35 on: April 12, 2006, 12:10:33 AM »

What's this?!?!?!  One of Nojc's rabbis and sntjohnny agree?!?!?!?

Excuse me... one of nojc's pseudointellectual rabbis... ;)

I am too shocked by this turn of events I must go to sleep right now.  Surely such a turn of events can only mean that the end of the world is imminent, and I want to get in a few hours of rest before it all goes down.

Thanks for your comments, Nojc.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #36 on: April 12, 2006, 05:03:46 AM »

Dear njc,
1) the heavens and the earth were created
2) the earth became chaos and vacant and in that situation water was covering the earth.
Jesus said it so well, "you by your **traditions** make the Word of God of none effect."

Gen 1:1 Created by the Elohim were the heavens and the earth.
Gen 1:2 Yet the earth became a chaos and vacant, and darkness was on the surface of the submerged chaos. Yet the spirit of the Elohim is vibrating over the surface of the water.

Your "was" in "was without form and void" is "haw-yaw" in Hebrew. "A primitive root (compare H1933); to exist, that is, be or become, come to pass"

Was Moses always Pharaoh's daughter's son or did he become her son? KJV has "became" same word used in Gen.1:2:
Exo 2:10 When the boy was growing up she brought him to Pharaoh's daughter, and he became her son. She called his name Moses and said: Because I have removed him from the water.

Was the staff always a serpent or did it "become" one? KJV has "became" also here. Same word used in Gen.1:2:
Exo 4:3 Then He said: Fling it to the earth. So he flung it to the earth, and it became a serpent. And Moses fled from its presence.

Same in Ex.4:4; 7:10; 7:12;
9:24 "since Israel became a nation" Same word used in "the earth became chaos".

Num.26:10 "became like a warning banner." Same word for "the earth became"

Deut.26:5 "became[/u] a great nation." Same word used for "the earth became"

ruth 4:16 "became a nurse unto it."

Ester 9:4 "waxed greater" or "became". We could say "the earth waxed chaotic" it became a chaos.

Psa.32:3 "waxed old" or became old);

Psa.83:10 "they became manure"); Just as they went from one form to another i.e. manure, thus the earth went from one form to becoming chaos.

Psa.118:14,21;

Truly, I say unto you, sntjohnny, the earth became chaos and vacant. God did not create it a chaos. It became one.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #37 on: April 12, 2006, 07:07:13 AM »

A problem with "educated" christians is that there are those who think they know Hebrew and those who think they know the Bible, who, in their arrogance, think that they can teach Hebrew to those who really DO know Hebrew, or teach the Bible to those who have studied it for thousands of years: that is, the Jews.
Those foolish christians are so certain that they understand what they do not understand that their certainty can lead them to think that Moses had horns simply because they think that's what they read in the Hebrew.

Wikipedia says: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses

Exodus 34:29-35 tells that after meeting with God the skin of Moses' face became radiant, frightening the Israelites and leading Moses to wear a veil. Jonathan Kirsch, in his book Moses: A Life, thought that, since he subsequently had to wear a veil to hide it, Moses' face was disfigured by a sort of "divine radiation burn".

This story has led to one longstanding tradition that Moses grew horns. This is derived from a mistranslation of the Hebrew phrase "karnu panav". The root may be read as either "horn" or "ray", as in "ray of light". "Panav"  translates as "his face". If interpreted correctly those two words form an expression which means that he was enlightened, and many rabbinical studies explain that the knowledge that was revealed to him made his face metaphorically shine with enlightenment, and not that it suddenly sported a pair of horns. The Septuagint properly translates the Hebrew word  as glorified', but Jerome translated it as cornuta, 'horned', and it was the latter image that became the more popular. This tradition survived from the first centuries AD well into the Renaissance. Many artists, including Michelangelo in a famed sculpture, depicted Moses with horns.

The foolish christians are so SURE they know what they're talking about, they'll even set it in stone!

In short, TonyN, your claims to interpret are falling on deaf ears. You don't know Hebrew (you think God is Lord "for the 'aeon' " rather than eternally, or some such foolishness, and think 'christ' means the same thing as 'moshiach' does), and you won't even consider that there could be more informed people anywhere on Earth than you think you are. Your foolishness and arrogance has led you into several stupid "certainties," possibly including that the Earth "became" void, rather than that it was that way from the start. Please note, however, that I do not say that it was, but that that's what I take Rashi's comments to mean.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #38 on: April 12, 2006, 09:28:43 AM »

So typical of njc to run a new rabbit trail rather than keeping with the topic. For instance, who cares how educated someone is. If the Bible says God did not create the earth a chaos njc will not believe it. Is this because he is uneducated or educated? I could care less. He is an unbeliever. He cannot believe this simple verse from Isaiah.
So rather than face his shortcomings he attacks the messenger.

Quote from: nojc4me
A problem with "educated" christians is that there are those who think they know Hebrew and those who think they know the Bible, who, in their arrogance, think that they can teach Hebrew to those who really DO know Hebrew, or teach the Bible to those who have studied it for thousands of years: that is, the Jews.
Those foolish christians are so certain that they understand what they do not understand that their certainty can lead them to think that Moses had horns simply because they think that's what they read in the Hebrew.


Tony's reply:
It is not a matter of one knowing Hebrew.
Fact is that your people who know Hebrew do not know God nor the power of God nor His Word. If they did they would not have said what they said in what you quoted!

They stated that God created the earth a chaos.
Yet the Bible says God did not create the earth a chaos:

Isa 45:18 For thus says Yahweh, Creator of the heavens; He is the Elohim, and Former of the earth, and its Maker, and He, He established it. He did not create it a chaos. He formed it to be indwelt. "I am Yahweh, and there is none else."

Just in case you missed it I enlarged it.

Quote
njc wrote:
The foolish christians are so SURE they know what they're talking about, they'll even set it in stone!

In short, TonyN, your claims to interpret are falling on deaf ears. You don't know Hebrew (you think God is Lord "for the 'aeon' " rather than eternally, or some such foolishness,


Tony's reply:
Ghee, you don't even know what I believe. For your information the Bible does not say that "God is for the eon." So how can I believe that? Rather, the Bible states that "God is the eonian God" in that He is the God pertaining to the eons. It is not telling us how long God lives but the relation He has to the eons. He is over them, subjecting mankind to them.



Quote
njc wrote:
 and think 'christ' means the same thing as 'moshiach' does), and you won't even consider that there could be more informed people anywhere on Earth than you think you are. Your foolishness and arrogance has led you into several stupid "certainties," possibly including that the Earth "became" void, rather than that it was that way from the start. Please note, however, that I do not say that it was, but that that's what I take Rashi's comments to mean.


Tony's reply:
well, it is hard to be humble when I'm right most of the time.
"Christ" means anointed. The 70 Hebrew scholars who translated Daniel from Hebrew or Chaldaic into Greek translated moshiach into Christou, which in English is "Christ." Blame it on those Hebrew scholars who knew Hebrew and Greek.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Deep Thought

  • Predominant User
  • *
  • Feedback: +10/-1
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 689
  • Feet on the ground and head in the clouds...
Genesis is Made Up
« Reply #39 on: April 12, 2006, 08:13:21 PM »

Heh. It's funny how a thread about the validity of the Genesis creation account turned into a debate about Gap Theory. Isn't this a bit off-topic? :wink:
Logged
"I am he that rules the world, don't you know?" - Jarlaxle

"Do keep ever present in your thoughts, my friend, that an illusion can kill you if you believe in it."
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 15   Go Up