Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: A sad, sad, story, I must tell,  (Read 3559 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« on: August 29, 2005, 12:31:09 PM »

A sad, sad, story, I must tell,

Why Universalists go to hell;

At last I've finally understood,

They all believe that God is GOOD!

Will Powell
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2005, 01:17:14 PM »

I don't think God as Spiritual Rapist is God as good.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2005, 01:42:00 PM »

Funny, neither do I.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2005, 02:26:31 PM »

Well there you go.  Your position contains a terrible conclusion.  I reject it on moral grounds.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2005, 02:40:52 PM »

You feeling O.K.?
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2005, 02:51:49 PM »

Feeling fine, of course.  Always dandy.  Yeppers, dandy.

I don't think a good God forces everyone, including those that really don't like'em, to eventually live in 'bliss' with him.

I would consider that spirtual rape.  He WILL have you, now hold still.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

TheAntiChrist

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1337
    • http://www.geocitie.com/markquinton/Atheism.HTML
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2005, 03:22:42 PM »

:roll: Maybe my one topic should of been "Christians are Stupid and/or Crazy".
Logged
For any christian who wants to leave their homeground chatting room. Try this site out.
Here is a site for Atheist.
Puddin Power!!!

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2005, 03:27:25 PM »

Of course, sntjohnny, everyone has to want to be resurrected to stand before the Great White Throne. God would never force that on anyone.
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

TheAntiChrist

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1337
    • http://www.geocitie.com/markquinton/Atheism.HTML
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2005, 03:36:37 PM »

I knew god was a racist. lol
Logged
For any christian who wants to leave their homeground chatting room. Try this site out.
Here is a site for Atheist.
Puddin Power!!!

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2005, 04:03:49 PM »

Anti, wouldn't it be more accurate to say 'sexist'?

"Of course, sntjohnny, everyone has to want to be resurrected to stand before the Great White Throne. God would never force that on anyone."

lol.  That doesn't sound like universalism anymore, then.  But naturally you will say that eventually everyone will want to be resurrected.  And this 'want' will be brought about how?   By a person's own free will?  You do believe in free will, don't you?
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2005, 08:06:54 PM »

Pro 21:1 Like rillets of water is the king's heart in the hand of Yahweh; Wherever He inclines, He turns it aside."

Interesting little proverb there johnny, yet packed with much wisdom. In the olden days in Israel they would irrigate their crops by furrows. The water would run diagonally to these furrows and only a little kick of the dirt to open up the channel of water or a little kick of the dirt to close off the flow of water to that row of crop was all it took. Thus also is the way God works. It's not hard for Him to control humanity.


"Come now, you who are saying, "Today or tomorrow we will be going into this or that city and should be spending a year there, and we will be trafficking and getting gain-who are not versed in that which is the morrow's, for what is your life? For a vapor are you, which is appearing briefly and thereupon disappearing instead of your saying, "If the Lord should ever be willing, and we shall be living, we also shall be doing this or that." Yet now you are vaunting in your ostentations. All such boasting is wicked" (James 4:13-17).

So, johnny, are you into wicked boasting in boasting that you can do whatever you want? You think that going to town and going shopping is outside the jurisdiction of God Almighty? If He doesn't will it, it ain't gonna happen. That is what James 4:13-17 is saying. Believest thou this?

Tony
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2005, 08:36:42 PM »

So yes, or no.  Do you or do you not believe in free will?
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

FUSSCCJ

  • Global Moderator
  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +0/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1176
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2005, 09:40:39 PM »

You two almost make me weep sometimes.  Instead of searching for things you agree upon (people who die without Christ will suffer a terrible punishment, accuracy of the NT, the best life is the one that glorifies God the most) you stick to attacking each other (different than arguing) on the same point over and over again.  If Christianity is at all about fellowship it seems quite lacking.
Logged
Playing it safe is risky

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2005, 10:04:59 PM »

I feel obliged to say, "He started it!"

That said, I actually am interested in starting a thread seeking out areas of agreement, but more for the whole forum.

You of course can have your opinion, Fuss, and I respect it.  I know you're coming from a godly position on it.  I have a different opinion, though, born of different experiences.   If you care to know more, you can PM me about it.

I would disagree with this statement as written:  "If Christianity is at all about fellowship it seems quite lacking."

I think you probaby misspeak.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #14 on: August 30, 2005, 05:26:42 AM »

And I will ask you again: "So, johnny, are you into wicked boasting in boasting that you can do whatever you want?"

Have you never read about King David and how he numbered Israel? That was a sin to do that johnny. And who MADE David sin? Yes, johnny, actually MADE David to sin. Do you know? Do you know who violated David's will? I'll give you three guesses

1) David
2) Satan
3) God
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #15 on: August 30, 2005, 07:00:51 AM »

Alright, so your answer is  'no.'  You do not believe that we have free will.    You believe this based on passages in the Scriptures.  You know that I hold the Scriptures as authoritative, so instead of answering the question, you are trying to argue me into having your position.

You want to have it both ways.  You want to not believe that we have free will and NOT accept the implications that this would constitute spiritual rape AND yet still say that God would not force us to want to be resurrected.  

Madness.

Its not that I don't want to answer Tony's question, nor is it that I don't have an answer.  Answering a question with a question?  The killed Socrates for a reason.

Fuss, it pains me to say it (well, a little) but the God that Tony worships is nowhere near being the God that I worship.  The areas of 'agreement' that you refer to that he and I might share are only positions using the same words but in completely different systems.  The source is the same, but all the rules are different, and words don't necessarily mean the same in both systems, either.  So even in areas of 'agreement' we might find, on even kindergarten level analysis, that we both mean different things by the common statement of belief 'shared.'  

If Tony ends up being right, then I will sit with the atheists and other rebels in 'immortality' and sulk.  I will join them all in giving Tony's God the finger, because I want nothing to do with his God.  Of course, me giving God the finger is actually God giving God the finger, so it's all good.
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #16 on: August 30, 2005, 07:34:16 AM »

sntjohnny said:

I feel obliged to say, "He started it!"

I know what you mean! There's a nut-case in my county who has it in for me, and whom I will not miss when he finally takes the Eternal Celestial Dirt-nap. For my part, this is because he;
A) Is former Law Enforcement, and takes much pride in the numbers of people he has caused to be arrested and convicted of non-violent, victimless activities. That means, he is a bully with a gun who wants to control others. I disliked him already, but that was all.
B) Threatened me with physical bodily harm ("I'll do war with you - physical war" are the exact words he used). He did that while hiding behind a pseudonym taken from a popluar movie. He knew my name, address, etc. but at the time I knew only what I've told you above about him so far.
To recap: He's somebody who once was supposed to enforce the law, he has a gun and is trained in using it, and threatened to violently attack an innocent and harmless person, with the intent to kill, while hiding behind a nom de guerre.
The name he was going under: "Braveheart."
Really!
Why did he threaten me? Because I disagreed with him, and could make my case with evidence he could not counter (because he had none - except the old "might makes right - and I have the might" line.) This disagreement was probably over the War on Drugs, but I could be wrong.
I called management of the board on which the threat was communicated and complained, but declined to have him banned.

I have since determined his identity, and have openly vocally opposed him in the last election * when he ran for school board (like HE should be allowed anywhere NEAR or empowered over a child in any capacity and/or for any reason! ) I opposed him by calling him a name. Childish, I know, but effective. The name I called him was not "Bully" or "Coward", but "Tax & Spend Liberal." What irked him about that particular tag was that it's true - and he's a member of the Republican Party.  I prefered to identify him as a "RINO." That stands for "Republican In Name Only."

That's background.

Since then, he's been trying to bait me into another confrontation. He'll start a thread, and wait like a spider on its web, for me to show up so he can get me to say something for which he can get me banned from the forum. Somehow, the forum's management allowed this thug-with-a-gun to be named "moderator." I think he's just waiting for an excuse to ban me.
It isn't working.
The last one he started was about the Libertarian Party losing its affiliation in my State. All Libertarians have been reassigned as "unaffiliated voters."  He claimed to be for it - prefers the Two Party System.
I showed up, just because I know he wants me to, and had my say and then watched. I said that the State should have no say what-so-ever about what political party a person can be a member of or vote for. My State's rules are among the most restrictive in the Nation.
As expected, he struck.
I ignored the attack, and watched the thread die. That's pretty amusing to me.

* I did not run against him. I was running for another office at the time.
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

nojc4me

  • Prevalent User
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-0
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1089
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #17 on: August 30, 2005, 07:38:17 AM »

That said, I actually am interested in starting a thread seeking out areas of agreement, but more for the whole forum.

I was looking at this, and wondered if we could set up a sort of quiz, list a bunch of concepts, and ask people to check off those with which they agree. But that could take pages and pages of concepts. We could start with "God" and wind up with "the sky is pretty."
Any ideas for something better?
Logged
Suggested Reading list:
"You Take jesus, I'll Take God" - Sam Levine
"The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" - Robert Heinlein
"Hope" - Aaron Zelman & L. Neil Smith
"The Probability Broach" - L. Neil Smith
"Wizard's First Rule" - Terry Goodkind (Check out the rest of the series, too.)
"The Constitution of the United States" - input from various American Statesmen (Read that as "Old, wealthy white men, now dead, who were often seen to be wearing wigs and hose in public.")

Anthony Horvath

  • Administrator
  • sntjohnny? I'm sntjohnny!
  • *
  • Feedback: +28/-41
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8493
    • http://www.sntjohnny.com
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #18 on: August 30, 2005, 07:56:50 AM »

Nojc, that is an extremely interesting story you tell there.  I kept my real life identity very much under wraps for a long, long time.  I made sure that very little personal information could make it onto yahoo and google, but it just grew to be impossible.  You just never know what is out there.

Anyway:

"I was looking at this, and wondered if we could set up a sort of quiz, list a bunch of concepts, and ask people to check off those with which they agree. But that could take pages and pages of concepts. We could start with "God" and wind up with "the sky is pretty."
Any ideas for something better?"

This is exactly where I got hung up.  I don't know what to start out with.  What is something so rudimentary that we might in fact be able to get everyone to agree with?  There is no way Heretic is going to agree the sky is pretty right now... its raining mortars on him.  I have some ideas on where I think such a thread SHOULD start, but I don't think they'd get very far.  Better to start with something that has some legs.

So no, I don't have any better ideas.  Anyone else?
Logged
Today's Favorite Quote:  "The UN is like GI Joe - an organization with the goal of world peace. Difference being one of them actually achieves their goals."  EndBringer

Yesterday's Fav: "I love when it all comes down to semantics, because that usually means I get to pwn someone."  Sir Somebody Something, Deep Truth, Trent, Solaris Paradox

Tony N

  • Semi-Super User!
  • *
  • Feedback: +1/-2
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1623
A sad, sad, story, I must tell,
« Reply #19 on: August 30, 2005, 08:53:45 AM »

Dan 4:35 All abiding on the earth are reckoned as naught:According to His will is He doing in the army of the heavens and with those abiding on the earth. And no one will actually clap with his hands and say to Him, "What doest Thou?

Go ahead, johnny, give Him the finger. After all, that's what you are doing with your blasphemous theology anyway.

But you know what? God uses the rebellion of man to His glory.

Johnny, God MADE David sin. This destroys your whole concept of free will-ism.

God made Joseph's brothers sin in selling Joseph into Slavery.

God made Shimei sin:

2Sa 16:5 When King David approached Bahurim, just then a man of the family of the house of Saul came forth from there; his name was Shimei son of Gera. He was going forth and was maladicting as he came forth. 6 He threw stones at David and at all the courtiers of King David, while all the soldiers and all the masters of war were at his right and at his left. 7 And thus spoke Shimei in his maledicting: Forth! Forth, man of bloodguilt, man of worthlessness! 8 Yahweh has brought back on you all the bloodguilts of the house of Saul in whose stead you have reigned. Yahweh is giving the kingship into the hand of your son Absalom; and here you are in your evil predicament because you are a man of bloodguilts!
   9 Abishai son of Zeruiah said to the king, Why should this dead cur maledict my lord the king? Let me now cross over and let me take off his head! 10 But the king replied, Whit is it to me and to you, sons of Zeruiah? Leave him alone! Thus he is maledicting because Yahweh told him, Maledict David! So who would say, For what reason have you done so? 11 Then David said to Abishai and to all his courtiers, If my own son, who came forth from my internal parts, is seeking my soul, how much more so then this Benjamite! Leave him alone and let him maledict because Yahweh told him to. . . .13 So David went along the road with his men, while Shimei was walking on the angular side of the hill to go abreast of him. He maledicted and threw stones abreast of him; he also threw dirt.

You say NO! NO! NO! That's not my God! You are right. It is not your God. Your god is the god of Christemdumb.

Tony
Logged
Did God say that He "will have all mankind to be saved" or that He "will NOT have all mankind to be saved? (1Tim.2:4-6]
Did God say He IS the Saviour of all mankind, or that He "is NOT the Saviour of all mankind? (1Tim.4:10)


Well?
Are we told to "charge and teach these things" or are we told "NOT to charge and teach these things"? (1Tim.4:10,11).


Well? Are we?
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
 

More Details